Must Go! Wrath of the the Titans by thedoctor777 Excellent movie. Better than the first by far. Great storyline and direction. Good acting and special effects, they were not over done and they weren't the star of the movie. A must go....
No Only for Speciail Effects by Cariz_TakeOn_it I saw this in 3-D at the Imax...so you'd think I would be more impressed...sadly...not the case. It's a boring movie propped up by an hour and a half of special effects...impressive as those are, I...
No Wrath of the Movie Makers by brave-hearted This was no where near as good as I expected it to be. The action shots were horribly done! The director has you so up close to the action and its moving so fast that you can't see what's going on....
67 Entertainment Weekly | Owen Gleiberman For a movie like Wrath of the Titans, which is basically "Gladiator" crossed with "Lord of the Rings" crossed with a special-effects demo reel (call it Lord of the Rinky-Dink), he's (Worthington) the perfect actor. Read full review
55 Movieline | Michelle Orange It would be a real shame, with this much money and this many effects artists, if there were not a few purely visual wows. Wrath manages exactly two, and not where you might expect. Read full review
50 Boston Globe | Tom Russo The moments that elevate Wrath above the routine are right in line with Liebesman's "Battle: Los Angeles'' high points: frenetically shot u-r-there combat sequences that feel like the real thing. Read full review
50 San Francisco Chronicle | Mick LaSalle This is a movie in which whole sequences consist of nothing but guys fighting stiff computer images. Such scenes would be boring even were they done well, but these scenes aren't done well. Read full review