By thomasreece
Written November 27, 2014
This is a beautiful, heart warming movie. Made more so as it is based on an actual like lived in an Iron Lung. The acting is terrific. It is joyous, sad, and hopeful.
17 out of 33 found this helpful. Did you?

Go see The Sessions....

Written July 29, 2015
The is a beautiful but, emotionally draining film. It deals with very real, very difficult topics of the human existence and does so in a profound way. It is truly a must-see for emotionally mature individuals and couples. WONDERFUL!
16 out of 29 found this helpful. Did you?

The funny,heartfelt,loving sex sessions

By seecofj
Written August 04, 2015
What a remarkable movie about a truly wondrous man. An ode to the human spirit under such bizarre circumstances. Anyone who who is bored with life should see it and perhaps not in a preachy way (no pun intended) rethink his or her own approach to sex,marriage,disability and the idea of life worth living. This movie stays with you for a long time. It's fun,quirky and thought-provoking. The music,actors direction and subject were so well done. Bravo!
16 out of 26 found this helpful. Did you?

Honest, honest movie

By gerryos
Written August 31, 2014
This movie was breathtakingly honest from start to finish. The script was very straight-forward, subtle, touching and based on a true story. I loved the wit and courage of the main character, the tenderness and humanity of the Helen Hunt's character and the vulnerability and nakedness of the story. It is right out there in your face with nudity, sensuality and love of the most touching kind. Do not miss this movie! I loved it.
15 out of 21 found this helpful. Did you?

Good story, but...

By vmkd55
Written August 21, 2014
The story line is fascinating, and most people who have read the reviews will know what it's about. What was strnage was the constant nudity of Helen Hunt. Some reviews have said, "At least it was relevant." Really? I thought the story line was about the sexual issues of the MALE character. Yes, nudity was relevant here, but why was it relevant only for Helen's character? I don't recall a single shot of John's private parts. It always fascinates me when actors say they get naked as part of the "art" of their movie, yet it's almost always the female actors who are the ones who get naked. And even though nudity was relevant here, did we really need to see so many shots of Helen's landing strip?
15 out of 18 found this helpful. Did you?