See it in
Digital 3D

Pretty Disappointed

By luisrcadiz
Written August 31, 2015
Of course the graphics and imagery were great....but I almost fell asleep during this movie. It was too similar to the Lord of the Rings and just simply not as good.
10 out of 16 found this helpful. Did you?

48fps is the way to go

Written December 16, 2012
Loved seeing this in 48 frames per second 3D IMAX. It looks very pretty, the epic battles are crystal clear, and the vast expanses of landscapes are a sight to behold. As far as the story, I really enjoyed it. Lighter than LOTR, it was still a great journey (so far). And Gollum? Looks better and as a result has his best performance ever. Worth every penny.
10 out of 16 found this helpful. Did you?

Do not recommend 3D

By zaitht
Written December 16, 2012
Too many scenes in 3D looked very fake. It took away from the experience. I would probably have enjoyed a regular screen viewing more. Many scenes at the beginning seemed silly and I found my eyes rolling at several instances. The movie did have some good points but not enough to think the movie as grand and worthwhile as the other trilogy. Somewhat disappointing.
10 out of 16 found this helpful. Did you?

I'll Watch All Three Because It's The Hobbit...

By wynder
Written December 15, 2012
But I made two just like this in the bathroom this morning. In short, the IMAX is awesome, the 3D is need and the HFR was interesting. I'm not sure of it was the combination of some of those, but most of the movie seemed too bright and without the regular camera filters (kind of like daytime soaps); so, it was kind of like watching a bunch of guys doing LARP with someone following them around with a video camera. Many of the scenes are way too long and drawn out (to turn this single book into a three part movie) and the included songs are alarming -- the scoring and choreography of the musical performances gives the actors the appearance of being more suited for Broadway than the big screen. The scare/edge factor is considerably less than LOTR and I hate what's going on the goblins speaking in a fairly normal human voice. All in all, I was very disappointed. That being said, will I watch the rest? Yeah, because it's The Hobbit.
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Did you?

The Hobbit Part 1

By aintryg
Written October 01, 2014
Its only fitting that Peter Jackson finishes out the Tolkien mainstay books as film. That being said, there were a few things I could have done without, some of the dwarfs were over cgi'd in my opinion, Thorin and several others looked fine, but others not quite so, it was at times distracting for me. Though I enjoyed the show immensely I cannot help but think it seemed not quite as well done as The Lord of the Rings trilogy was, which is perplexing since most of the same folks were involved. That's been something that's sorta nagged at the back of my mind ever since seeing it, though honestly I cannot point to any one thing that left me with that feeling. (Other than the dwarfs I suppose.) All that aside I feel it is well worth seeing on the big screen, the vistas are just as stunning as they were in the trilogy, due to New Zealand's remarkable natural beauty, the returning actors are a delight to see again, and Richard Armitage does a great job as Thorin as does Ken Stott as Balin.
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Did you?