See it in

  • Digital 3D

bug

By bug10
Written July 02, 2015
Great movie loved it in IMAX 3D. Very awesome special effects .great story line:). Will go c it again. I have all dvds now i get to add this one great movie u must go. told others they r all going. loved it :)
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Did you?

A must-see for fans of the LOTR Movies - 2:45 goes by too quickly

By SandP
Written September 04, 2015
While I am not a big fan of the current trend of splitting novels into 2 (or more) movies, I think Peter Jackson pulled it off with The Hobbit part one. Even at a healthy 2:45, the movie did not drag and the plot did advance at a reasonable pace. The film (in Imax and 3-D) is visually stunning and seeing familar characters and locales again was wonderful. I beleive that the version I viewed included the 48 fps that critics have commented on extensively - if so, I did not see anything to complain about. The 3-D was seamless (no gimmicks) and Peter Jackson and his crew have created one of the most immersive film experiences to date.
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Did you?

Worth waiting over 40 years for this movie! J.R.R. Tolkien would surely approve!

By CalBears75
Written November 28, 2015
I first read The Hobbit in 1967 or 1968 and hoped that some day it would be made into a movie worthy of the masterpiece that J.R.R. Tolkien created. The movie was certainly beyond worthy. Martin Freeman is absolutely brilliant as Bilbo, and each and every cast member is fabulous. I rarely see a movie twice, but have seen this one twice already and hope to go again before it leaves the Imax.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Did you?

visual spectacle with story intact but broadened in scope

By munirshaikh
Written November 29, 2015
Jackson does a great job overall of telling the core story with all the major beats from the book and a few adjustments for film structure/format. He puts the Hobbit into a broader Middle Earth context and weaves it into the LOTR films. Most significantly, Jackson has a knack for expanding the scale of scenes in his translation from the books to cinema. Overall, a very entertaining first entry in the trilogy.
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Did you?

Great movie, Bad in 3-D

By carnicom
Written May 05, 2016
Wonderful prequel to the LOTR trilogy. The 3-D, however, was poorly done and distracted from the cinematics. I found myself looking back and forth between at the characters in the foreground in 3-D and the panoramic vistas in the background in obvious 2-D. I recommend they avoid this in the next two films. I woulld recommend the 2-D version for those who have not seen it yet.
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Did you?