See it in

  • Digital 3D

The Hobbit Stands on its Own

By Bronsonious
Written February 12, 2016
I have read several reviews saying this moving is not Lord of the RIngs. Well, its not, its the Hobbit. For those of you that have read the book, the Hobbit is a lot lighter and thoughout the movie I had the feeling of adventure although at times some of the action scenes felt over the top. Compared to LOTR, which is a dark epic journey, The Hobbit is a fun epic adventure. The visuals were stunning which led me to shake my head and say wow during the moving. I imagine the 3d helped. Speaking of 3D, 99.9% of the time the 3D was fantastic. There were 4 scenes that were blurry because of the 3D but this may be me being over critical and it did not detract from the moving. All in all its good to be back in Middle Earth and see The One RIng. The Hobbit is a must see. edit:grammar
52 out of 79 found this helpful. Did you?


By ladykate13
Written May 01, 2016
With expectations running high, the first part of the trilogy of the Tolkien classic The Hobbit did not disappoint. The casting was brilliant, the music was magical, the special effects were seamless, the scenery was stunning, and the 3D was simply mesmerizing. All of my favorite lines from the book were present, but there were some subtle shifts in the story itself. Unlike most book adaptations though, every deviation here succeeds in making this a better movie. Normally I would caution against having hopes set too high since even mild disappointment can ruin an otherwise enjoyable film. In this case however, even the highest expectations are met to great satisfaction. If you fail to enjoy this movie, you might as well give up on the silver screen entirely, or you simply hate hobbits. For the other 99.9%, I invite you to return to a world of magic and peril, of courage in the face of gathering darkness, and discover again the extraordinary strength hidden in the unlikeliest of people.
49 out of 69 found this helpful. Did you?

Spectacular Visual

By jordanjpayne
Written May 23, 2015
The story plays out very well, personally, I am pleased that they have chosen to stretch this out to three parts as this will hopefully allow for all the rich detail of the story to be told as it should be. The cast were all very good, and there were solid performances from everyone. The make-up looks a little fake every now and then when you're seeing the dwarves faces at this scale. We went to the MAX 3D screening at AMC Lincoln Centre and found it a bit overwhelming at times. I don't think 48 fps bothered either of us too much; we both just find that fast movement in 3D is difficult to process. The slower scenes are amazing and I'm looking forward to seeing this in HD on my TV as I think this is one of the most visually spectacular movies I have watched. The only thing I would complain about is the HDR, which at times makes the picture look very odd - less realistic - and grainy. I look forward to the next two instalments, well done to all those involved.
35 out of 61 found this helpful. Did you?

A Quick 3 Hours :)

By minibooger
Written August 01, 2015
I had seen early reviews indicating that the movie was slow-paced, that too much time was spent on character development concerning the dwarves. I found that to not be the case at all. As with any large cast, you do need to be introduced to the characters, but this was done at a good pace with the adventure beginning as expected. I'm not a huge fan of 3D, but was able to watch without getting the customary headache. Some of the fast moving scenes were blurry, but that is the case with all 3D movies. Other than that, the 3D added depth to the majority of the scenes and there were very few gratuitous reaches into the audience. The reaches that were made were sensible and pertained to the plot. Also being concerned about switching from Ian Holmes to Martin Freeman, I found that the transition used was an easy pill to swallow. I was able to quickly accept Martin as Bilbo and immediately become engrossed in the story without distraction. All in all, I felt it was very well done.
34 out of 62 found this helpful. Did you?

Meh. Tolkein's character development sacrificed to spectacle.

By Thomas Pinchin
Written April 29, 2016
Converting the novel to prequel from preamble to The Ring trilogy is only a modest success.I welcomed Jackson & Co.'s imagination of the pre-Smaug Lonely Mountain and the origin of Thorin's Oakensheld moniiker. From then on, though, it's obese. the additions to pad out a modest novel into a cinematic epic became ponderous. Too many orcs! Sadly, cut from the movie version are the small but telling incicents that develop Bilbo's character as an unlkely hero and gradually win the respect of the dwarves. Instead, we have Gandalf pontificating about how evil can be defeated by the small actions of ordinary people. Amazing. A movie that doesn't show, but tells. So the cinematic narrative is weak compared to the Trilogy,which instead tightened the original Tolkien tale. I'm not a 3D fan, but those who are may appreciate the ciinematography which certainly has its moments.
31 out of 54 found this helpful. Did you?