See it in

  • Digital 3D

bug

By bug10
Written July 02, 2015
Great movie loved it in IMAX 3D. Very awesome special effects .great story line:). Will go c it again. I have all dvds now i get to add this one great movie u must go. told others they r all going. loved it :)
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Did you?

A must-see for fans of the LOTR Movies - 2:45 goes by too quickly

By SandP
Written September 04, 2015
While I am not a big fan of the current trend of splitting novels into 2 (or more) movies, I think Peter Jackson pulled it off with The Hobbit part one. Even at a healthy 2:45, the movie did not drag and the plot did advance at a reasonable pace. The film (in Imax and 3-D) is visually stunning and seeing familar characters and locales again was wonderful. I beleive that the version I viewed included the 48 fps that critics have commented on extensively - if so, I did not see anything to complain about. The 3-D was seamless (no gimmicks) and Peter Jackson and his crew have created one of the most immersive film experiences to date.
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Did you?

Worth waiting over 40 years for this movie! J.R.R. Tolkien would surely approve!

By CalBears75
Written November 28, 2015
I first read The Hobbit in 1967 or 1968 and hoped that some day it would be made into a movie worthy of the masterpiece that J.R.R. Tolkien created. The movie was certainly beyond worthy. Martin Freeman is absolutely brilliant as Bilbo, and each and every cast member is fabulous. I rarely see a movie twice, but have seen this one twice already and hope to go again before it leaves the Imax.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Did you?

Everything I Expected & More!

By Aliciamcdaniel
Written April 30, 2016
Peter Jackson & Co. didn't disappoint! It was awesome! Cinematography was excellent. The New Zealand landscapes were shot as well as they were in The lord of the Rings. Defiantly go see it in the theater, don't wait for DVD. It's ok to take the kids, not too violent.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Did you?

Great movie, Bad in 3-D

By carnicom
Written May 05, 2016
Wonderful prequel to the LOTR trilogy. The 3-D, however, was poorly done and distracted from the cinematics. I found myself looking back and forth between at the characters in the foreground in 3-D and the panoramic vistas in the background in obvious 2-D. I recommend they avoid this in the next two films. I woulld recommend the 2-D version for those who have not seen it yet.
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Did you?