Written March 29, 2007
Personally i believe the movie was OK. Definately not what i expected and i continue to believe that part one was much better.
Written April 21, 2009
I give every movie a chance and never walk out of the theater. I have never even come close to walking out until I went to see this display of pure brutality and absolutely sickening special effects. The makers of the film went straight to the gore factor and nothing else. I wouldn't see this movie unless you have a strong stomach and are into a lot of gore.
Written May 02, 2009
I find this movie absolutely disgusting. And, no, it's not because of all the gore. With horror films nowadays, due to a lack of imagination, it's to be expected. But, was the rape scene really necessary? Was the second rape really necessary? No.
Written March 13, 2009
I didn't think the movie was very good. It was a poor remake for several reasons the acting wasn't very good they all seemed dumb. The story needed work and to much blood and violence. The only thing I really liked was the baby and dog lived at the end. I think Doug was cute though and ended up beating those creatures. The movie was just different and not interesting and also seemed incomplete for some reason.
Written July 03, 2008
the best horror movie ive seen in years
great amounts of gore
the actors werent bad
and very very scary