It was worth seeing in the theatre

By jwlynch1
Written August 11, 2012
Overall a good movie, not as much action as the other Bourne series, but the dialog supported the movie fine. Although I would say NWIH that car could keep up with a motorcycle in Manilla traffic...
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Did you?

what....?

By xaznxremnantx
Written August 10, 2012
What!?!?...... No. This movie had so much potential.... No. No. No.... ::sigh::
12 out of 25 found this helpful. Did you?

A Good Stretch for a 4th Bourne Movie

By darren_averett
Written August 23, 2014
Jeremy Renner and Rachel Weisz are great actors. They actually make the movie. The movie picks up after the last Bourne movie with Matt Damon. It is a bit of a stretch to keep things going in this vain. But it is all a setup for another movie. While this movie did have some decent action scenes, I sincerely hope the producers read all of the viewer quotes then strive to inject serious awe into the next production.
12 out of 18 found this helpful. Did you?

The Bourne Legacy

By fred1
Written August 23, 2014
Jeremy Renner and Rachel Weisz are good in this film. Edward Norton plays a good version of a "government ******* leader." The film is so different from Matt Damon's role and the other Bourne movies. I think you have to see it more than once in order to switch gears. Basicly, "The Bourne Legacy" is about taking you "genetically" into the undercover government program and showing you that "another one has gotten away." The film does come at you from a new angle. It is slower paced with some action and one disturbing scene. Mostly, I liked the hidden chemistry between Renner and Weisz's characters.
12 out of 18 found this helpful. Did you?

IT was just ok

By AlohaGoJo
Written August 12, 2012
It was just ok. We have always really enjoyed the previous Bourne movies. Jeremy Renner did great however the movie lacked the action the first movies had. Plus the ending was terrible.
11 out of 18 found this helpful. Did you?