Better than Expected!

By mrfijiwiji
Written August 10, 2012
Went to the premiere out of loyalty to the original trilogy. But wow, much better then i was expected. The lack of matt damon in this movie turned me off initially. It wasnt better than the original trilogy, but this was on par with the other bourne movies. Aaron still has the vital qualities of Jason bourne, but is a totally different character. The dynamic between June and Aaron was excellent. The acting was great; production value was on par. At the end of the movie i was disappointing... because i didnt want to stop watching!
13 out of 24 found this helpful. Did you?

what....?

By xaznxremnantx
Written August 10, 2012
What!?!?...... No. This movie had so much potential.... No. No. No.... ::sigh::
12 out of 25 found this helpful. Did you?

It was worth seeing in the theatre

By jwlynch1
Written August 11, 2012
Overall a good movie, not as much action as the other Bourne series, but the dialog supported the movie fine. Although I would say NWIH that car could keep up with a motorcycle in Manilla traffic...
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Did you?

Bourne, ... the Legacy continues

By kkinge
Written December 01, 2015
This sequel to the Bourne Trilogy maintains the level of adrenaline of the others. Its premise is plausible and thoughtful. The action scenes and effects are impressive. I thought Rachel Weisz's performance could have been better. Still, ... I'm looking forward to the nest one.
12 out of 17 found this helpful. Did you?

IT was just ok

By AlohaGoJo
Written August 12, 2012
It was just ok. We have always really enjoyed the previous Bourne movies. Jeremy Renner did great however the movie lacked the action the first movies had. Plus the ending was terrible.
11 out of 18 found this helpful. Did you?