Written April 29, 2016
We love Liam Neeson, but this movie was lacking in believability. A lot of action, but the movie seemed rushed. Good concept, but fell short for us. Not as good as the first by a long shot. Would not have this one in my collection.
Written October 07, 2012
If you appreciate cuts that are too short, a horribly written script, a reliance on the former movie, rampant discrepancies, and an extreme waste of actors' talent: this movie is for you!
Written February 28, 2015
The movie was good. However, I could have waited to see it On Demand or DVD. I feel it wasn't as good as the original, like most sequels. It was typical Taken perdicaments and crazy ways on how Brian uses "his skills" to get out of them. Not as much action as I hoped, but good enough for me to see again outside of the theatre.
Written February 08, 2016
Good, but not as good as the first. Some of the same lines were used....which was kind of corny ("Focus, I need you to focus"). Neeson's particular set of skills were once again displayed in an entertaining way, but unoriginal. Over-rated, but worth seeing.
Written April 30, 2016
The first one was better only because you can't do the same thing in 2 movies and expect the second one to get rated as high as the first.
The plot was not the best. His ex wife should have been killed.
Since Bourne everybody has their own one man gang taking on the bad guys.
At least in Man on Fire the main character died. I know it was based on a true story.
Stop making all these super human one man gang movies.
You've seen one you practically seen them all.