FANTASTIC! More than what I thought it would be.

By Schumann_Special12
Written July 31, 2014
I'll start off saying that the cinematography in this film was stellar. It was amazing, and eye-catching, and unique. I just LOVED it. Yes, there was tons of partying in this film, but it had a lot of deeper content. If you were watching the film correctly, you could easily see the deeper psychological context, which was displayed mostly by the build up and repetition of sound. The greatest performance was James Franco, of course, who never faltered-- I admit, I was waiting to see a note of his true self. But Franco stuck to it, and performed brilliantly. Vanessa Hudgens was very intense, and stuck to her character as well, and I hope to see more of this work from her in the future. Ashley Benson and Rachel Korine gave very good performances too. But Selena Gomez was truly lacking, and displayed her little experience in the acting field. I, nor my friend. could get a grip on what she was trying to do with her character. It was the only bad aspect of the film.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Did you?

Spring Breakers

By stevendbeard
Written September 18, 2014
This is pretty much as the title says , Spring Break . Four college girls are bored and looking to put a little adventure into their lives so they decide to go to Florida for spring break . Selena is the church goer while Vanessa and Ashley are a little more on the wild side [to help finance their trip , they rob a business] . When they arrive in Florida , they meet James , a local want-to-be gangster [you may not recognize him , he wears dreadlocks and has metal on his teeth] . James gives them the thrills that were missing in their lives [a little too much for a couple of the girls] and things spiral out of control . This is the first 'R' rated movie for Selena . There is nudity [not for Selena] and drug use [yes for Selena] so this one is not for little kids . It's rated "R" for sexual content [including nudity] , language , drug use and violence and has a running time of 1 hour & 34 minutes . I don't think I would buy it on DVD but it would be alright as a rental .
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Did you?

Worst movie I've seen in 2-3 years!

By barrybuzz
Written March 17, 2013
My friend and I read the reviews that, overall, it was a decent film. This movie was so bad on so many levels, I don't know where to begin. I can't believe Franco agreed to do this film. If you like staring at t-ts & butts for 90 minutes, you're better off watching free porn on the internet.
10 out of 17 found this helpful. Did you?

the new cult classic!

By godstevies
Written September 21, 2014
God doggy! This movie so refreshingly original and raw. The cast was electric, most notably James Franco, who absolutely went to another level. Hilariously serious and rebellious. A cult classic for the ages.
10 out of 16 found this helpful. Did you?

Review title (optional)

By samvernekoff
Written July 27, 2013
Review body (optional)
9 out of 15 found this helpful. Did you?