See it in
IMAX

Not Your Typical SciFi for Kids

By drollness
Written October 01, 2014
This is one to see on the big screen. You have allusions to "2001," you have thoughtful, quiet scenes reminiscent of "Blade Runner" and you have some good old fashioned action that even rivals some of the recent stuff. All in all I say if you want a movie that is more than just fun, not to take anything away from the comicbook movies, then you "Must Go!"
10 out of 17 found this helpful. Did you?

So-so, then hilarious

By Tanka
Written May 17, 2013
As in "Tron: Legacy," constant Kubrick references force unkind comparisons. From HAL-eyed drones to a cartoonishly Southern-accented mission controller to a ship named Odyssey to one habitat's color scheme perfectly matching the "2001" moon shuttle interior, it's all kind of sad. It becomes a laugher as Cruise is revealed as a thousand Star Child clones! Which maybe reflects both Cruise's stated awe of "2001" and his Scientological vision of himself as a reincarnated perfect being. Mimicking Kubrick's real candlelit scenes to claim some perfectionist cred while allowing dark action scenes to retain poor quality contrast and blur is phony, non-adult behavior, but Kosinki's movies are for kids. Kubrick wannabes need to start where he did, not dolly shots or prod. design but with tough CONTENT. See "Moon" instead. Incredibly similar isolated clone worker story, except they mine helium-3 instead of salt water. Salt water for energy? "Moon" has valid Kubrickisms w/out the bloat.
10 out of 46 found this helpful. Did you?

Very derivative of other (better) sci-fi movies

By oconnjr66
Written December 26, 2014
Throughout this movie, I was constantly reminded of movies like The Matrix, Planet of the Apes, Moon, 2001 and a little bit of Minority Report (a Cruise movie). Some would say that this is being derivative; others would say that's it's just ripping them off. It looks good and Cruise does a good job with what he has to work with, but I was actually bored through much of it and none of the twists/suprises were really suprising, just confusing. I was hoping for a lot more. I was also disappointed in the Morgan Freeman character (can't remember his name); after a great introduction, he just just kind of fades away and has no real purpose in the movie until the end. His character could've been played by anybody, so all of the passion, fire and talent that Freeman has is wasted. Overall, I'd give it a "C". Not really worth going to the theatre to see; wait for the DVD to rent.
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Did you?

Review title (optional)

By DZM2
Written August 02, 2013
Review body (optional)
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Did you?

Good story. Very creative.

By mdd770
Written April 20, 2013
We liked the movie. The story was good and it was very creative. It was good in XD. Good effects. And there was no swearing. Very refreshing for a change.
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Did you?