LOGIN, AMIGO!
I'm sure any die hard Twi-hard would be down to watch multiple Twilight-related documentaries, but Summit Entertainment isn't too keen on giving you that option since, ya know, they want to gobble up all the Twilight for themselves (and who can blame them?). Essentially, there are two Twilight documentaries in the works right now – both of which revolve around the real-life Forks, Washington, and the affect the Twilight phenomenon has had on the small town, which, in the book, is the home of Bella Swan and all her weird, vampiric cronies.
Tags: Twilight
happyferret said...
Summit is actually claiming a trademark on trees? Mother Nature should be next in line.
Reply
lovestalentmoviefan said...
They are different images! Summit is just greedy;they would do well to be thankful for their audiences,and be an example by giving other companies have opportunity as well.
dgstarzz said...
ummm... they look nothing alike... get over it summit, you're not the only ones that can cash in on twilight.
said...
Since when can a Forest be trademarked? I totally agree that summit is just getting greedy.
lotlife said...
Who would buy either of these? I never watch the free bonus discs that come with every "special edition" dvd as it is. Only Mother Nature can trademark trees. I would be willing to bet that both companies are greed driven. Even topics ent. is producing a dvd doc. about someone elses movies- That doesn't sound right. James Cameron would even be pissed if I started to make my doc about avatar. Both companies are lame.
LacePen117 said...
Oh brother this is all bs. Summit is getting greedy. eesh
dumbgreek said...
How can you people not see they're identical. They both have TREES. Summit is totally justified. /sarcasm
movie_guy said...
Why spend the money on a documentary about the real life town based from the book? Seriously? Even if you do buy it, if you watch it more than once i pitty you. Spending 15-30 dollars on something that will be on TV in 6 months is about as smart as me posting to this in the first place.
lactarango33 said...
The point is another company is cashing in on someone else's idea. Stephanie Meyer gets royalty on every piece. Isn't it her right to say yes or no? By the way the tree line with Twilight on the front is a complete knock off. They are disquising their product as a twilight product...that is what is wrong.
boyofsf said...
agreed I don't think they are arguing about the wonderful backdrop the "twilight" looks just like a summit productions "twilight" and actually if the Documentary is on the real life city of Forks and how the Twilight books have caused a tourist attraction then no one need pay royalty fees to anyone. Stephanie did write about a real place. that exists in our world. did she have to pay royalty fees? no.
karra said...
The only thing the same is the font and last time I checked Chicago Style guide unless you create the font you're sunk.
Sign in to your Fandango account or register for a new account.
Sign in using your Facebook account.
Help
"Welcome to the party, pal."
"When am I gonna learn how to punch?"
"These go to eleven."
"Benjamin, have you ever been severely beaten about the face & neck?"
"Just keep swimming, swimming, swimming."
"You're gonna need a bigger boat."