LOGIN, AMIGO!
Joss Whedon Talks ‘Avengers’ Script and Female Characters
Would it absolutely crush you if they didn’t make The Hobbit?
Tags: The Hobbit, Star Trek 2, The Avengers, Joss Whedon
Categories: Fanboy Fix
ThatGuyThatLovesMovies said...
They NEED to make the hobbit, not only is it one of the more fun of Tolkiens books, it's also a great setup for Fellowship. ON top of that this movie is gonna be a cash cow I really don't see why these producers aren't trying even harder to make this movie. Maybe producers should stop rereleasing movies in theaters, yeah thats you avatar, and work on getting actual quality stories like The hobbit made.
Reply
Daisho said...
Similair to the Halo film that was never made, I don't think the Hobbit should be made into a movie yet. (Until most of the crap that is preventing the film from being made has been done with.) Most fans want the film done soon, but I say otherwise. Let the producers take their time making the Hobbit, I don't want to be disapointed with cheap graphics and dialouge.
PlyBoi2419 said...
Your probably too young to even there were two orginal version to the hobbit,one in animation and a failed live version from the 1970's.
macline said...
"Where there's a whip, there's a way"!
cheeseyB said...
Try as we must, we cannot forget the classic rendition of the Hobbit staring a singing and dancing Leonard Nimoy. (shutters)
Oh I remember all right, the animation of the Hobbit was an epic movie in my opinion. (But a live action version of the Hobbit? I need to check that out!)
lturp1 said...
The animated "Hobbit" was incredible! I saw it on TV when I was a kid(knew nothing of the Hobbit at the time), and i was convinced it was one of the best films ever made! lol. I still love it and it is just as good today.
TORSOMAN said...
i remeber the animated one but never heard of the live action one
embalmerlady said...
I NEED Peter Jackson to make the Hobbit. Many fans are out here waiting. DO IT NOW before the cross-over cast ages too much.
FaridSly said...
The Hobbit must be made and I will be crushed like a cockroach if they don't make it!!!!!!!!! F*ck these studios man!
mister956 said...
Odd that they would use Star Trek 2 as a working title since there already was a Star Trek II back in 1982.
said...
lol...can't you see the difference between 2 and II? lol j/k
i2ambler said...
Yes, they should really call it something like 'The Wrath of Khan'. Since it is going to 'Thematically Resonate' with viewers I will assume a main character will die at the very end.
HoodCritic1 said...
Star Trek is dead.
spinsphere said...
They can do anything they want with Trek now, just start making Movie-quality episode re-imaginings; fine with me. However, I reeeeeally want Shatner!!!
CalMan41 said...
You mean the priceline negotiator. LOL.
scootergirl said...
no no no... Denny Crane!
Oh- and as for The HOBBIT- I wish they could all just not be so greedy- no matter how you split a zillion dollars, everyone will be happy!
Batman finally got it right with the last two movies, by showing who Batman really is. Unike the previous attempts he was protrayed as a true Vigilante. I hope the Avengers stay the same. I understand that making a PG movie is more fiscally intelligent however superhero movies are not that good when you make them too kid friendly. These movies are for adults who watched them as a children. We would now like to see them in adult versions. Oh an someone please start a riot if they decide to make another GI Joe. Pumping $100M into a movie does not guarentee success. Ask Kevin Costner and Water World.
jahcriado said...
They could make ST 2 awesome by having them go back in time and keeping the last one from being made. It would be a paradox, but it would save the st uni from that piece of crap (& I was expecting so much more from JJ).
I'm sorry but I have to ask, what WERE you expecting? What were the faults? How would you have improved JJ's recreation of the Start Trek Universe?
WillyMan said...
By not making the abomination at all. J.J. might as well walked over to Gene Rodenberry's grave and took a dump on it. Star Trek was always about humanity and exploration, not about action sequences, explosions and lens flares. Now they want to make it dark and gritty like TDK? They should have just retired the franchise and laid it to rest.
Large Corn No Butter said...
WillyMan... you rock! Grave site defecation!? tasty. Oh, you're completely spot on' by the way.
ProfessorMoriarty said...
It's not about the action, explosions and lens flares; it's about the crew being destined to come together despite the differences in the timeline from TOS. Leonard Nimoy has been intensely involved in almost all of the films regarding TOS characters, and if he approved of their vision for ST XI, that's good enough for me. The characters are portrayed by actors who emulate, but do not mock or mimic, the characteristics of the TOS actors - it is a respectful tribute to what was created before. I see where you're coming from, but I don't think you're looking at it without prejudice.
I've seen some fan-fiction movies that better emulate the characters. I love Nimoy, but I am not blind loayist. Lets look at the last 3 SW movies. Done by Lucas himself. They sucked. Just because an original has his hand in it, does not mean its good. I think the characterizations were way off and horrid, the movie was plastic feeling and, even for a ST movie, most of the sci-fi content was dumb (red matter? really?). I was hopeful for this movie, grew up on reruns of the OS & all of the last 3 good series (tried watching enterprise... no). But this... no.
Sign in to your Fandango account or register for a new account.
Sign in using your Facebook account.
Help
"Welcome to the party, pal."
"When am I gonna learn how to punch?"
"These go to eleven."
"Benjamin, have you ever been severely beaten about the face & neck?"
"Just keep swimming, swimming, swimming."
"You're gonna need a bigger boat."