We Love Movies Sweeps

You could win a YEAR OF MOVIE TICKETS!

We Love Movies Sweeps
NO PURCHASE NECESSARY. Open only to legal residents of the 50 U.S. and D.C. who are at least 18 years of age (or the age of majority in the jurisdiction of their residence, whichever is older) and who have an active email account and Internet access as of 5/5/15. The Promotion Period begins at 9:00:00 a.m. PT on 5/6/15 and ends at 8:59:59 a.m. PT on 8/16/15 and is comprised of 103 separate and distinct Sweepstakes Periods, with each Sweepstakes Period lasting for one (1) day beginning at 9:00 a.m. PT on one calendar date and ending at 8:59:59 a.m. PT on the following calendar date during the Promotion Period. Entries from each Sweepstakes Period will not roll over to a subsequent Sweepstakes Period. Void where prohibited. Odds of winning dependent upon total number of eligible entries received during each Sweepstakes Period. Limit of 1 entry/pp/Sweepstakes Period. One (1) Grand Prize Winner will be randomly selected for each Sweepstakes Period from all eligible entries received during that particular Sweepstakes Period. 103-Grand Prizes: one (1) Fandango Promotional Code worth up to $720.00 USD good toward the purchase of movie tickets on www.Fandango.com or via the Fandango mobile app and valid until 8/30/16 (ARV: $720.00 USD). See complete Official Rules at http://www.fandango.com/sweepstakesrules/welovemovies for complete prize details, retail values and alternate method of entry. Sponsor: Fandango, LLC.

Day 72: 'Wild Grass'

 'Wild Grass'

Watching Inception on Day 71, I came away from it trying to figure out what I thought about the ending, marvelling at the care and sheer number of ideas they'd packed into a summer popcorn movie, and wishing it had more of an emotional impact to it.

Cut to Day 72 and esteemed French director Alan Resnais' Wild Grass, and I'm even more perplexed by the film's final scene, glad that the defiantly old-school art film features many of the same ideas about memory, imagination and connection, but wondering if some of Nolan's narrative clarity would have sharpened the feelings that genuinely do pervade Resnais' work.

Granted, this is an art film that features a clear-cut story but intends to willfully defy convention. It starts with a single, middle-aged woman - who shares a dentistry practice with her friend and is a part-time pilot - having her bag and wallet stolen. Later, in an empty parking lot, a 50-ish gentleman - happily married with kids and grandkids, but also harboring a secret from his past - finds the wallet. After it's returned, a long, strange relationship forms between the two, which eventually involves the woman's friend and the man's wife. The guy is a huge movie buff and fellow aviation lover, too, so those interests also inform the film's plot.

The way Resnais literally focuses his camera on certain details, creates flashbacks, and uses musical cues - including the famous Fox fanfare - combines to heighten the film's "conscious" effect and playful cross of genres. You always know you're watching a movie and being jarred jaggedly and smoothly between contrasting scenes to feel an emotion. Unlike Nolan's Inception, which felt like a perfectly calibrated feat created by an engineer, Resnais operates from the opposite direction. He's an unpredictable painter throwing random colors up onto the canvas. One of the film's best scenes is almost a film short unto itself which features the two leads walking towards a coffee shop with a movie theater in the background, the word "Cinema" lighted on the marquee in bright flourescence, with the narrator describing how the couple were "almost holding hands."

There is a little action in the film at the very end, but it's at its best conveying the messy, complicated relationships that evolve between flawed human beings. There's a gauzy quality to Eric Gautier's cinematography, combined with Mark Snow's dreamy score, that puts the movie into a magical place that's as impressive in its own unique way as the alternate world experienced in Inception. And again, the last scene is just as puzzling as Nolan's conclusion. For now, they both come off to me as more tricky than satisfying. But I'll keep thinking about it...

Like it? Share it:

Next Article by cwalton

Day 71: 'Inception'

Day 71: 'Inception'

Send Me FanText

Thanks for signing up!

By entering your mobile number and clicking "SIGN ME UP!", you consent to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy and authorize Fandango and its service providers to deliver FanTexts and other promotional texts to your mobile phone. Text marketing authorization is not required for any purchase from Fandango. Message and data rates may apply. We will not send more than 5 msgs/month. You can unsubscribe at any time by texting "STOP" or seek help by texting "HELP" to "FNDGO" (36346).

×