Written October 27, 2016
Don't waste your money seeing it in 3D. Good film, but not converted to 3D very well
Just another opportunity for Pixar to capitalize on re-running a film they have in their vault. Same as Nemo
Written October 10, 2015
I never saw this the first time it was out and I absolutely loved this movie. the #d is great as well and definitely adds to the experience.
Written November 26, 2015
Great movie as always but the 3D is totally unnecessary and not a good conversion. Save your money rent it for a dollar in 2D.
Written August 25, 2016
If you saw this the first time around, you should go check it out in 3D. Mike's fur looks even furrier (and closer), and the conveyor belt scene at the end is more like a roller coaster.
Written July 01, 2016
Having seen this movie about 10 times with my kids before, I didn't have a lot of expectations of watching the 3D version; after all, how much "better" is it going to be? I must say I was pretty satisfied, even though it wasn't cheap!
The usual problem with "3D" movies is that the effects are over exaggerated, and they can look somewhat 2.5D (layers of flat characters/objects). I think folks at Pixar did a great job, making the movie not trying to be so "3D" - it just felt VERY natural. I am pretty sure they also re-rendered the movie in a much higher resolution too; things looked very sharp when they were supposed to.
My one criticism is the textures on eyes. I don't know if anyone noticed, but many of the eyeballs had simple curved 2D textures, and not a fully modeled in 3D. That made characters seem very cheap and cartoonish in some scenes. Perhaps Pixar didn't have time to remodel those, but given the re-release, that we pay full price for, I think they should have.