See it in

Les Miserables

By kathied924
Written June 30, 2016
After seeing the Broadway play twice, I was hoping that the film would capture my heart as well. And it did. Remembering that it is a time piece, it showed the wretchedness of France in the 1800's, the suffering of the people under a horrible government, and the hopefulness in the hearts of the people for a better life one day. Each character is totally unique, the singing is beautiful, and I found this movie to be emotionally unforgettable. Ann Hathaway is deserving of any award for which she is nominated. The difference between the play and the movie??? The movie brings the characters face to face -- you see the pain, the anquish, the heartbreak, and the hope. I loved it. It will truly stay my favorite. Thank you Victor Hugo for putting this story to paper. And thanks to Claude-Michel Schönberg for the music, Alain Boublil and Jean-Marc Natel for the French lyrics, and Herbert Kretzmer for the English adaptation. It is truly a work of art.
23 out of 39 found this helpful. Did you?

EPIC! Audience roared with applause!

By jirwin69
Written August 29, 2016
Seen the stage show 11 times...this was fantastic! BRAVISSIMO TO HUGH JACKMAN AND AARON TVEIT AND EDDIE REDMAYNE! BRAVISSIMA TO ANNE HATHAWAY AND SAMANTHA BARKS! IMHO, the close up camera shots were great, brought home the emotion for me more so than what a stage production can give. It will be a challenge to keep your tears at bay, so be forewarned that it is heartbreaking to watch at times! Heard sniffles all through the theatre and then was not expecting the outbreak of thunderous applause after the final chord. Is it perfect?, but as a classically trained singer and educator who has seen the show 11 times, I absolutely loved it. I can appreciate the technically and vocally demanding score and the talent that is required to bring it to fruition. This was a monumental task and I am happy to say WELL DONE!
22 out of 40 found this helpful. Did you?

Les Miserables

By ccidog4u
Written August 28, 2016
I am such a fan of this musical. I have probably seen it about 40 times. I have seen it in London, New York, Atlanta, Los Angeles, etc.... I was totally shocked by the singing (or lack of singing) of the 2 main leads characters. I was not totally surprised by Russell Crowe since he is not a broadway singer but Hugh Jackman was a real disappointment. There were bound to have been better singers in Hollywood than these two men. This musical deserved strong singers which neither of them proved to be. I would rather they have used unknowns that could sing instead of name actors that couldn't.
22 out of 42 found this helpful. Did you?

Les Miserables

By ricmon
Written May 26, 2017
I had seen this play in the theater and I wasn't sure how is would transfer onto film. I was pleasantly surprised. It evoked many emotions. The theater was completely packed, even though it was Christmas morning at 11:00. It was so quiet that you could hear a pin drip. Tears flowed throughout the movie. If I had to pick one word to describe the movie, it would be POWERFUL!
22 out of 34 found this helpful. Did you?

Actors in a musical should be able to sing!

By AnneStewart
Written December 25, 2012
When will Hollywood understand that star power does not always work? I would have rather seen no name actors who could really belt out the numbers that those of us who have been fans of Les Miz have come to expect. Thank goodness someone had the good sense to make sure Colm Wilkinson was in this film. One could hear chatter in the theater as soon as you saw (and heard) him. If you are a long time fan you will know who I am talking about. I really, really wanted to love this film, but I did not. I always at least tear up during the live performance but not this film. Parts of the movie were simply odd and awkward.
21 out of 60 found this helpful. Did you?