See it in

Some of the Drama is lost...

By mcsarge
Written July 23, 2016
A great movie, but I have found that some of the incredible drama of the original stage production was lost because the performers, though pretty good, are not good enough singers for the material. I wish they had enlisted real singers, not famous actors for the roles. With the exception of Fontine, Marius and Cozette (both young and old) the rest of the cast was good, but not great. If they had real singing talent on the screen this would have been one of the greatest movies of all time. Using established talent, though safe, made it fall far short of what I was expecting.
17 out of 24 found this helpful. Did you?

Someone Give Anne Hathaway an Oscar!

By MedRed
Written July 28, 2016
If you're a fan of Les Miserables and/or musicals... this is a must go. If not, this may be a long movie for you. This rendition of Les Miserables does not follow the Broadway show or the novel verbatim. The general story is there, but several character relationships are disconnected from their as written roles. Despite being streamlined, the story is cohesive. The acting in this movie is beyond top shelf. That being said, Hugh Jackman has a tough time pulling off the vocals and Russell Crowe's characterization of Javert doesn't have the curt and clipped vocals expected of his character. Anne Hathaway absolutely steals the show with her performance. Sacha Baron Cohen and Helena Bonham Carter provided a nice touch of comedy. I found the visuals just ok, but I'm recently spoiled from the amazingly beautiful sets of Anna Karenina. That's less important as Les Miserables focuses heavily on the characters faces. If you like my reviews, add me as a fan. I'll add you back
16 out of 26 found this helpful. Did you?

Go if you enjoy musicals

By mistialice
Written August 26, 2016
Very moving, very intense, and very long. If you can't sit though 3 hours of music - a total of 49 songs, don't go. If you like musicals, history, period costumes, and beautiful sets, you should indulge yourself.
15 out of 25 found this helpful. Did you?

Good But 1.camera work almost ruined it and 2. PG-15!

By maritdw
Written May 30, 2016
Fabulous, BUT... ~~~Music was surprisingly good -coming from a die hard Les Mis fan. Acting was excellent. Costumes were good. The staging was nice. Story was exceptional -change your life- kind of story, as usual. Characters were for the most part very believable.~~~ The camera work was terrible. Almost ruined the movie! They shot it in a stylized format with very short depth of field - backgrounds blurry and directs your eyes where they want you to see. However, they missed. Short depth of field too short and with moving subjects? the closeups were out of focus about half of the time. Seriously! Why pay $10 for a movie when they don't have any of their face in focus? Not even one eye? VERY DISTRACTING! Also, they used wide angle lenses several times that distorted the faces too much. ~~~The vulgarity, and sex scene were too much. The violence was strong. Too much for a young teen.~~~Truer to the book than the musical - a little. good overall. See, but with caution.
14 out of 24 found this helpful. Did you?

MUCH MUCH BETTER THAN CRITICS INDICATE

By rvm61
Written July 24, 2016
True to the play, this movie reveals more of the original novel. Music is great...as in the musical. Story is great...as in the Novel. Movie is great...as in GO SEE IT!!! After reading a couple of critical reviews, I was concerned the movie would be a let down. I am happy to inform you that it is not. Be ready to shed a tear. My girlfriend sobbed half of the movie.
14 out of 26 found this helpful. Did you?