See it in

MUCH MUCH BETTER THAN CRITICS INDICATE

By rvm61
Written July 24, 2016
True to the play, this movie reveals more of the original novel. Music is great...as in the musical. Story is great...as in the Novel. Movie is great...as in GO SEE IT!!! After reading a couple of critical reviews, I was concerned the movie would be a let down. I am happy to inform you that it is not. Be ready to shed a tear. My girlfriend sobbed half of the movie.
14 out of 26 found this helpful. Did you?

You've created a junkie

By Happy_Hokie
Written January 04, 2013
Having only seen the Liam Neeson movie version and having NOT seen the musical, I was surprised and stunned at how beautiful and moving this movie was. I have since become a Les Mis junkie (sorry to my poor husband) and now offer the following: I thought the vast majority of the actors sang their roles beautifully. Regarding Russell Crowe - he can carry a tune but don't feel he was great choice for Javert. In fact, I found it distracting to have him in the movie because no matter what, when you see him you just think, "Hey - there's Russell Crowe and he's singing. Why is he singing?" Samantha Barks was fantastic as Eponine. I loved her version of "On My Own." Sacha Baron Cohen was fantastic as Thenardier. I did find some of the group singing hard to understand. Cockney is difficult to understand when merely spoken, let alone sung. In the end, I was sobbing with everyone in the theater. Bring tissues.
14 out of 20 found this helpful. Did you?

Great acting, but racier than expected

By samwise_writer
Written December 27, 2012
I've heard most of the recordings and have seen the production live. Since I knew that actors, rather than professional musicians (for the most part) were taking the leads, I expected the acting to be superb, the singing to be so-so, and the emotional intensity to be extremely high. All three exceeded expectations. The most disappointing aspect of the movie to me was its raciness. I was particularly disappointed by how sex and prostitution were treated as funny in Master of the House, although those same things ruined Fantine's life. The producers seemed to be sending a very mixed message, caving to the typical Hollywood expectations rather than focusing on the social evil that Victor Hugo showed prostitution to be. I was uncomfortable with its explicitness, having taken my younger sister and cousin along with me, expecting the raciness level of the stage show rather than this. However, the redemption message remains powerful. Worth seeing.
14 out of 24 found this helpful. Did you?

True to Broadway production

By czakemerick
Written February 14, 2016
A superb production of the stage musical. Makes it more personal and meaningful. The live singing performances are awesome and bring tears to your eyes. For a major Les Miserables fan it is THE BEST! Oscar worthy for Hugh Jackman, Anne Hathaway and for Best Picture! Will definetly see it again!
14 out of 23 found this helpful. Did you?

Excellent Performances by all except....

By NAM0862
Written May 26, 2016
Les Miserables is a most poignant story. The demand for vocal acuity in this film is imperative for the viewer to remain engaged and feel the emotional valeur. The performances were great, unfortunately, I found Crowe's inability to sing to distract me from the story as well as detach myself from feeling any sympathy for this character. Jackman's vocals were only slightly better that of Crowe's, and if these two characters were casted by two men that have the ability to sing, I would have enjoyed the movie that much more. As for Hathaway, her performance brought tears to my eyes - she is absolutely lovely. In fact, all other characters sang wonderfully and with such passion - I was enthralled Aside from the poor singing by both Crowe and Jackman, the movie is wonderful and entertaining but I will not watch it again because of these two actors - I will instead read the book by Victor Hugo.
14 out of 29 found this helpful. Did you?