Sort of a poor mans Tarantino, but not.

By archerman
Written December 04, 2012
What happened to Hollywood writers? Where they unavailable for this? This was the most uninteresting mobster/heist movie I've ever seen. Great actors. Great cinematography. But what about story? What about clever dialog? Not here folks. The writing was lame. Just boring rambling in a wannabe Tarantino sort of way. Nothing new, clever or funny in the "black comedy" this was supposed to be. Pitt was good as usual as was the rest of the cast but the script was not worth the effort. Some interesting visuals. That's about it.
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Did you?

killing them softly

By michaelf7627
Written December 12, 2012
was very disappointed. left the movie feeling sick because it sucked so bad. was very confusing and slow, never really knew what the hell was going on. the best part is the slow motion shooting scene.
10 out of 19 found this helpful. Did you?

Don't waste your money!

By lrobert1
Written December 09, 2012
My husband and I both didn't like it at all. Would have turned off if watching at home. Good acting but WAY too many unnecessary F bombs.
10 out of 21 found this helpful. Did you?

Absolutely AWFUL

By garysarah
Written December 02, 2012
My husband and I left after 40 minutes. I was ready to leave after two minutes. Nonstop profanity. Bad plot. Brad Pitt wasn't even in it for the first 20 minutes and from what I was, wasn't award worthy.
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Did you?

Killing Them softly

By nancy1202
Written December 10, 2012
Terrible movie - the theater should be embarrassed to charge for this DOG. Thought because Brad Pitt was in it, it would be worth seeing. It was VERY SLOW, VERY BLOODY - truly can't think of ONE redeeming this about this film. If the goal was to show an extremely seedy side of life it succeeded - that's the only thing it succeeded in doing. Nancy1202
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Did you?