Jennifer's BodyMovie Reviews

Gifts + Promos

• So-so Based on 403 reviews
  Breakdown:

• Sort by: Helpfulness
• Review Date

• No
  Written September 19, 2009

  • 

    typical non-horrifying stupid retarded non-funny

  by dianajonesss

  • 28 out of 32 found this review helpful.
  • Was this helpful to you? 
  • Yes
  • No
• Must Go!
  Written September 29, 2009

  A MUST SEE MOVIE

  by moviefan567

  The movie was awesome. Everything about it. Megan Fox was great in it as the rest of the team. Clever, funny, scary, sexy, emotional. Great job everyone involved.

  • 12 out of 17 found this review helpful.
  • Was this helpful to you? 
  • Yes
  • No
• Must Go!
  Written September 23, 2009

  Expected it to be very stupid, IT WAS GREAT!

  by cgracealways

  I honestly was expecting a stupid horror movie with bad acting....but THIS movie is great!!! If you liked Idle Hands with Jessica Alba (1999), you will LOVE THIS! I think 75% of bad reviews for all movies are from people who aren't in the right mood during the movie or have way too high of an expectation. Like this movie, Jennifer's Body, I think they had way too high expectations and was expecting this to be a horror film like Halloween or Saw, don't expect that, expect a COMEDY-HORROR type of film, and most of all HANG LOOSE AND RELAX!

  • 10 out of 14 found this review helpful.
  • Was this helpful to you? 
  • Yes
  • No
• Go
  Written September 30, 2009

  Jennifer's Body-For Once Men Are The Victims!!!

  by LUV MOVIES N NY YANKEES

  As a female horror fan, I must say that this is a start. It may not be the perfect horror film, but as a horror fan I felt I had to go see it. Men are the victims in the film but you will see why. I especially loved the very end because it completed the film and I felt satisfied.
  
  This film was funnier than it was scary, but it was very entertaining so I think it's worth watching.
  People take horror films too seriously! You can't compare this to Alfred Hitchcock or Stephen King or Japanese original horror films! If you do, of course you will be disappointed. See it for fun that's all.

  • 10 out of 14 found this review helpful.
  • Was this helpful to you? 
  • Yes
  • No
• No
  Written October 3, 2009

  Boring, Not Enough of Anything

  by MustBeIMAX

  This movie sucked. Megan Fox plays Jennifer, the popular hot girl at school who gets possessed by a demon and starts killing off the school's male attendants. Sounds fun, right? Well, they managed to take an awesome idea and mess it up. This movie is, quite simply, boring. It was underplayed way too much, and I found myself checking my watch nonstop halfway through. This movie wasn't funny enough, scary enough, or sexy enough. It was just...BORING. If you think that you need to see it, rent it, but don't go out of your way to see it. It wasn't awful, it wasn't good, it wasn't okay, it was just boring. I wouldn't recommend that anyone see it.

  • 8 out of 11 found this review helpful.
  • Was this helpful to you? 
  • Yes
  • No
• So-so
  Written September 20, 2009

  She's Foxy But That's About It!

  by adicullen

  I was pretty disappointed by this movie. I like Megan Fox and Amanda Seyfried. I was happy that Adam Brody was included in the cast. It always bothers me when the previews are not included in the film. That happened quite a bit with this movie. It was humorous, gory, but not exactly a great horror film. There were no jumps and although there seemed to have been an attempt at a plot they failed miserably. Teens will probably enjoy this film regardless. Not appropriate for those under thirteen in my opinion.
  
  It wasn't worth the $9.50 ticket price. However, renting it might be worth it. Cheesy acting, lots of nudity....entertaining? Not so much.

  • 9 out of 13 found this review helpful.
  • Was this helpful to you? 
  • Yes
  • No
• Go
  Written September 20, 2009

  Jennifer's Body

  by Mr NiPPiE

  If you extremely hate horror and gruesome bloody violence than stayfar away. But I also dont understand why people think that the actors in here are that terrible. Especially from Megan Fox. She wasnt that bad. she was just okay. She still hasnt proven herself as an actress yet so...But Amanda Seyfried really did steal the show. She proved herself that she could carry this film and actually do something like this with this particular genre. It was violent so as i said if you arent a big fan of horror then of course stay away. But it was a good film. Im talking in general for anyone. It was a great horror film. It had the good gore and horror violence and it had the sex, but it didnt go overboard with that, and it was scary it was very scary. I would be interested to see if there is a sequil and i do think that horror fans should miss out on Sorority Row to see this.

  • 7 out of 10 found this review helpful.
  • Was this helpful to you? 
  • Yes
  • No
• Go
  Written March 9, 2012

  Jennifer's Body review

  by Punk_Kanellis

  This movie has been out for about 3 years. I?ve heard plenty of feedback from fans saying they ?hate it, it was corny, bad effects and acting, etc.?. I would definitely have to say that I agree with the acting part of that, but it was extremely entertaining! First of all, I love Megan Fox. I think she?s gorgeous and talented (to an extent). She may not be Julia Roberts, but she?s still good. Amanda Seyfried played the ?nerd? role really well. Actually, she played it really, really well. But her relationship with Jennifer made no sense. As for the boys, the one that stood out to me was Kyle Gallner. You probably know him from Haunting in Connecticut, or A Nightmare on Elm St. He is the guy for horror movies. He played a great punk in Jennifer?s Body.
  
  As for the comedy part, there wasn?t a lot of that. What there was, was a lot of was the raunchy, fake-gore horror. It was definetly predictable, yet good. I couldn?t tear my eyes away!

  • 4 out of 4 found this review helpful.
  • Was this helpful to you? 
  • Yes
  • No
• So-so
  Written September 26, 2009

  DARK COMEDY

  by laylaalvar

  I'm a chicken when it comes to horror movies. But, in this case I wasn't. Mainly due to the fact that it's not really a horror movie, but a DARK COMEDY. Make sure to keep that in mind. Don't expect super duper GORY crap, 'cause you aren't getting much. I gotta admit though, it's one HELL of a movie. Not only is it funny, it makes a lot of sense too. Usually I find myself questioning the whole point of certain movies.. like "GEE, that sure made a lot sense?" Thankfully, I understood their motives and whatnot. Diablo Cody is AMAZING. ONE of the most entertaining movies of the year.. considering that lately they've SUCKED! Enjoy :)

  • 8 out of 12 found this review helpful.
  • Was this helpful to you? 
  • Yes
  • No
• Oh No!
  Written March 12, 2010

  WHAT THE F***!

  by Cinemax123

  This was so f***ing stupid I can't belive someone decided to write this movie! I didn't find this movie funny, scary, or "awesome". Whoever said it was awesome must be high or something. I can't believe I sat through this whole movie. Just take my word, DON'T SEE THIS MOVIE!

  • 5 out of 7 found this review helpful.
  • Was this helpful to you? 
  • Yes
  • No
• Oh No!
  Written October 7, 2009

  yeah whatever

  by Kandykrush

  Dude this movie sucked so badly, I think the only purpose of this movie is to show how much of a **** meghan fox is honestly. There is no purpose for it, it seriously wasted my time and money, I walked out of the theater angry. I mean really anyone who says that this movie was even close to good are idiotic morons who dont look for talent. Jeezus the only thing she is really good for is small roles that dont matter.
  
  please dont make the same mistake I have.

  • 9 out of 15 found this review helpful.
  • Was this helpful to you? 
  • Yes
  • No
• So-so
  Written September 28, 2009

  Not for everyone

  by doralmintz

  For a "horror/comedy", I thought it was ok overall, but it had several flaws. For example, why didn't Jennifer go after the band for revenge? She went after boys that did nothing to her, but then again, she craves blood so badly that anyone will do. Megan Fox is beautiful to watch but the best character who stole the show is "Needy" played by Amanda Seyfried. This movie is generally geered to a young audience, between 16 - 20. On a scale of 1-10, I give it a 5.

  • 6 out of 9 found this review helpful.
  • Was this helpful to you? 
  • Yes
  • No
• Must Go!
  Written September 25, 2009

  awesome. funny, scary at times and megan fox was in it. put all those together and you got a great horror comedy!

  by movie_goer315

  megan fox is the perfect bad girl gone evil, and ofcourse she's very sexy. the movie was alot of fun. to the people saying: "that wasnt scary at all. **** this movie it wasnt a horror movie!" you guys obviously didnt see that it was a horror comedy.........its supposed to be funny with some gory and creepy moments thrown in around every corner. ending was pretty damn awesome too. i wont spoil it for anyone i just have to say its really cool. hell i never get scared of horror movies and this one scared me at times! go see it if you just wanna have a good time and be a little creeped out. also go see it if you wanna see some sexy megan fox moments lol

  • 5 out of 8 found this review helpful.
  • Was this helpful to you? 
  • Yes
  • No
• Must Go!
  Written September 25, 2009

  Better than expected...

  by TheTattooCouple

  Despite what others have said, this movie was actually better than expected. it was definately funny, not as scary as i thought it would be but over all a really good movie and an interesting story line. there were parts that were quite disturbing but in a good way. Meghan Fox was really creepy and amazing. Amanda Seyfried was also amazing, the range of emotion she had to go through for this role was incredible. overall...amazing!

  • 3 out of 4 found this review helpful.
  • Was this helpful to you? 
  • Yes
  • No
• Oh No!
  Written September 21, 2009

  tries to hard

  by ayepapii

  megan fox is hot and all but she cant act. they try to hard to make her hot cause they know the movie sucked.

  • 3 out of 4 found this review helpful.
  • Was this helpful to you? 
  • Yes
  • No

• Page: 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• 7
• 8
• 9
• 10
• More Reviews