Review title (optional)

By Olsen roy
Written July 28, 2013
Review body (optional)
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Did you?

Fine acting believable story

By teeemkay
Written May 05, 2016
The acting in Hyde Park was great from everyone but from Mr. West who played the king it was wonderful.The story was believable but was a litttle sad. The only thing lacking was more character development but nothings perfect. Overall we were glad we went to see it.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Did you?

Pass on this one

By who_cares_i_don't
Written June 29, 2016
Maybe my viewing was colored by having just visited FDR's house in Hyde Park the weekend before, but this is a really muddled film. It's not bad, just confused. It doesn't seem to know what it is. Maybe Richard Nelson should have written it as a play (seems like maybe he originally did) but it's fine in some places, laughable in others, and dull in many. Bill Murray and Laura Linney, as always, are great, but what they have to work with is so thin and surface-level, it's kind of hard to watch sometimes. Skip the movie - visit the real Hyde Park instead. Now THAT is honestly fantastic.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Did you?

Check Your Morals at the Door

By Reel Reviewer
Written January 04, 2013
While I was enjoying watching this film, as it is fun, clever, and well acted, the last five minutes spoil the whole film. While I understand that people cheat, and do a many other terrible things as well, I don't appreciate the tone of, "Well, it's okay because everyone involved agreed to it," that this movie so clearly took. Aside from my moral objection to the tone of cheaters, however, I liked the movie. Bill Murray was fantastic, as well the rest of the cast, and the cinematography beautifully captured New York's agrarian side. There are two scenes in particular that stand out, one for being glorious and one for being strange. First, strange: the movie makes a big point to talk about their being cousins, but they're fifth or sixth cousins. There's nothing wrong with that except that they actually know one another. So when they become intimate I feel like it's trying to make FDR into an even bigger creep. The glorious: FDR and King George VI alone time over drinks was masterful.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Did you?

Embarrassment, historically inaccurate, and shameful ploy for earning money

By floridarla
Written September 02, 2014
Don't waste your time, energy, brain cells, or money on this movie. It is a disgusting, ridiculous, inaccurate, and rude "take" on FDR and his relationship with a dear relative. The movie portrays every single historical figure incorrectly and shamefully. The producers of this movie should be embarrassed to have their names related on the credits -- I certainly would be. But then again, some people will do anything to earn a buck.
8 out of 17 found this helpful. Did you?