88

Boston Globe

By Wesley Morris
Writers Nicholas Stoller and Judd Apatow remake is more devilish, hitting its targets with the reckless glee required for a round of Whac-A-Mole.
Full Review
75

Charlotte Observer

By Lawrence Toppman
Carrey rolls his eyes and waggles his arms, and Leoni keeps up with him while pushing less hard. He externalizes, she internalizes, and the balance works as it might in a good marriage.
Full Review
63

Chicago Sun-Times

By Roger Ebert
Recycles the 1977 comedy right down to repeating the same mistakes.
Full Review
50

New York Daily News

By Jami Bernard
A sharply comic critique of corporate greed might have added to the national dialogue, but this is a series of hit-&-miss sketches.
Full Review
50

The Hollywood Reporter

By Sheri Linden
While the 1977 Fun With Dick and Jane was a reasonably diverting sendup of conspicuous consumption with a subversive if not always razor-sharp comic edge, the new version... replaces smart performances with tired shtick.
Full Review
50

San Francisco Chronicle

By Mick LaSalle
The new film's social message comes through loud and clear, but something in the comedy seems constrained -- effortful, yet muffled. It might be a matter of the right tone never having been found.
Full Review
50

USA Today

By Claudia Puig
There's really not much fun to be had with Dick and Jane - or anyone else in this anemic comedy.
Full Review
50

Entertainment Weekly

By Owen Gleiberman
Wearing a brush cut that never fits the role, Carrey doesn't do a lot here besides flash those vampire-nerd teeth, and I grew weary of seeing them.
Full Review
50

Philadelphia Inquirer

By David Hiltbrand
In mood and in content is just SO 20th century.
Full Review
25

Rolling Stone

By Peter Travers
Build a comedy around Jim Carrey in manic mode and they will come. Case in point: Fun With Dick and Jane, a pointless, painfully unfunny and yet inexplicably popular remake of the 1977 fizzle with Jane Fonda and George Segal.
Full Review
47 out of 100
Mixed or average reviews
Metascore® based on all critic reviews. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more favorable reviews.