Very Surprised

By jason5870
Written August 22, 2014
WOW!!!! I was a huge fan of the first movie and thought this would be a complete POS but was I wrong. The special effects were the best I have seen in a long time. The 3d effects were legit becuase it was shot in 3d and not converted for theater. The headshots with the guns were brutal. Dredd was really a executioner instead of the first movie were it was more Family orriented. GO SEE IT!!!!!
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Did you?

Better than I expected...

By TravelinWayne
Written September 24, 2012
I had not seen any of the other Dredds so I wasn't sure what to expect but I wasn't expecting much. I was pleasantly surprised. I enjoyed it!
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Did you?

Better the second time around

By onenetnut
Written September 24, 2012
This version of Judge Dredd is a major improvement over the Stallone attempt. Good story line that does not focus on re-inventing the characters. You never see Urban's face, which is consistent with the comics. I like Olivia Thirlby as Judge Anderson as well. I hope this is the start of a new franchise.
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Did you?

Dredd 3d, or how you adapt an adult comic book.

By OthelloNYC
Written September 30, 2012
I went into Dredd 3D expecting only a slight improvement to the Stallone debacle. I have to say I was pleasantly surprised, for many reasons. For one, the 3D while possibly done in post, and gimmicky, actually enhanced the scenes where it was obvious. It was mostly utilized during "slo-mo" trips, as the drug gives everything a slow motion feel, and an acid-like weirdness. The look of everything was so gritty and realistic, including Mega City One itself. It didn't look like a cartoon, it looked like a real, populated city that stretched further than the mind could comprehend. With all the physical activity that took place in the film, I DO endorse not having the giant shoulder eagle on Dredd's costume, and instead going with the early comic concept sketches. Karl Urban's total lack of ego really puts this film in my must see list. He was Joseph Dredd, street judge, on a screen, not Karl Urban in a costume with some catch phrases.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Did you?

I judge this remake awful. The sentence is death...

By 140bytemoviereview
Written September 29, 2012
OK, first off, Sylvester Stallone's 1995 'Dredd' wasn't great. Not bad, but other than the immortal words 'Double-Whammy' wasn't particularly memorable. But it did have the good sense to not take itself too seriously. Not so this Dredd. It is 95 minutes of grim, unrelieved bloodshed. It starts off with three gang members being skinned alive (yep, that kind of movie) and tossed off a 200-storey building by Lena Headey's vicious drug-lord MaMa (and she has a blast with the role). Enter Dredd and his psychic rookie played by Olivia Thirlby. They go in to make their arrests, then have to kill their way out of a nuke-proof public housing project of the future. Speaking of Thirlby... she's the best reason to watch 'Dredd'. I saw it in 3D, but she is the only multi-dimensional character in the entire movie. While a step back from her work in 'Juno', I can't wait to see her in something better than this waste of her talents. I hope Hollywood is paying attention... @140bytemovereview
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Did you?