ChloeMovie Reviews

Gifts + Promos

• Go Based on 85 reviews
  Breakdown:

• Sort by: Helpfulness
• Review Date

• No
  Written April 4, 2010

  Very pedestrian attempt....

  by lovestalentmoviefan

  ...at what was supposed to be a cerebral,as well as an erotic, psychological thriller. I am really surprised at this,considering Neeson and Moore are such solid artists. In fact, such graphic nudity and sexuality in movies is extremely distasteful to me,and against what I believe should be put on film.However I was intrigued by idea of seeing what these two Hollywood mainstays would do with it.Although Moore's work was extremely satisfying,the dialogue and context were what was missing. Neeson was average,and Seifried's role could have been played by almost any actress in the age range. The graphic dialogue took away the sensuality of women and their thoughts and fantasys--even their "M.O.s" so to speak. Chloe's opening dialogue with the "peeking" at her getting dressed was more erotic than a graphic sex scene,and the director should have kept at that level of vicariousness for the audience.Good potential in story,would have been better with more story and less blatancy and pornograph

  • 12 out of 13 found this review helpful.
  • Was this helpful to you? 
  • Yes
  • No
• No
  Written April 5, 2010

  No depth below the surface

  by laurikey

  OK, so we know that Liam Neeson and Julianne Moore's characters need some more pizzazz in their marriage. I understand that the mind can bring out one's insecurities, one's passions, and one's imagination. HOWEVER, if a filmmaker is going to add some psycho pathology to the story, can he/she please not insult the viewer's intelligence and please provide some character depth to the "villain"? The director is counting on the audience's love of erotic allusions, and love for the 2 lead actors, but the character development was basically nonexistent, especially of Chloe. Is that intentional? Even if so, then we need to know more about what makes the husband and wife's relationship so troubled. This was one weird movie that tried too hard to be one part psychological study, other part erotica, and both laid flat.

  • 8 out of 10 found this review helpful.
  • Was this helpful to you? 
  • Yes
  • No
• Oh No!
  Written April 27, 2010

  stupid...indie wannabe

  by analafanatica

  So bad I won't even write more...

  • 5 out of 8 found this review helpful.
  • Was this helpful to you? 
  • Yes
  • No
• No
  Written March 27, 2010

  • 

    felt embarrassed for lead actors

  by brownrf

  • 3 out of 4 found this review helpful.
  • Was this helpful to you? 
  • Yes
  • No
• I'll Pass
  Written March 22, 2010

  by Ivettecortes

  • Was this helpful to you? 
  • Yes
  • No
• Must Go!
  Written March 31, 2010

  • 

    Thrilling Sexual Creative Suspense Different

  by PsychChick

  • 1 out of 3 found this review helpful.
  • Was this helpful to you? 
  • Yes
  • No
• I'll Pass
  Written March 12, 2010

  by PhillyFreak93

  • Was this helpful to you? 
  • Yes
  • No
• Must Go!
  Written May 1, 2010

  Chloe

  by dlcnayo

  This movie is very good, and actually had a twist in the end that was not expected which made the movie more exciting.
  
  I loved it...

  • Was this helpful to you? 
  • Yes
  • No
• Go
  Written April 17, 2010

  by dwight_fan

  • Was this helpful to you? 
  • Yes
  • No
• I'm In
  Written March 4, 2010

  by jerseyjones

  • Was this helpful to you? 
  • Yes
  • No
• I'm In
  Written March 13, 2010

  by iluvmenthatsparkle

  • Was this helpful to you? 
  • Yes
  • No
• I'm In
  Written March 9, 2010

  by debibickmore

  • Was this helpful to you? 
  • Yes
  • No
• Go
  Written March 29, 2010

  by alohilani

  • Was this helpful to you? 
  • Yes
  • No
• I'm In
  Written March 15, 2010

  by vamp-cullen

  • Was this helpful to you? 
  • Yes
  • No
• Go
  Written March 28, 2010

  by passionpepper

  • Was this helpful to you? 
  • Yes
  • No

• Page: 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• More Reviews