boring

By belkis8
Written July 28, 2015
I was so excited to see this movie due to some of the actors.. However, the whole movie seemed to drag. It was a good plot, but I wish I hadn't wasted my money. YOU be the judge!.
19 out of 38 found this helpful. Did you?

Broken City

By lovemypets
Written March 30, 2015
The movie was fine but seriously compromised by the absolutely horrible seats. If the seats hadn't been so bad, then I think I would have enjoyed the movie even more. Two of my favorite actors was hard to pass up! I got a little lost when trying to connect the dots, but, in general, I liked the movie and acting.
17 out of 31 found this helpful. Did you?

Broken City

By stevendbeard
Written August 28, 2015
This is a gritty cop drama that takes place in New York City . Mark plays a New York cop that is involved in a shooting of a civilian [he is cleared] . He is forced to retire [he is told that it would be better for the city] and he becomes a private detective . Russell is the mayor and he hires Mark to investigate his wife , Catherine , whom he suspects is having an affair [re-election is coming up and he doesn't need the bad publicity] . Barry is Russell's opponent in the upcoming election and Kyle is running Barry's campaign . There are dirty politics at play , as well as blackmail and believability issues [who is telling the truth and who can you trust ?] . It's rated "R" for language , sexual content [there is some semi-nudity] and violence and has a running time of 1 hour & 49 minutes . It was good but not much better than what you might see in a t.v. show . It's not one that I would buy on DVD but it would be alright as a rental . Later, Steve
17 out of 31 found this helpful. Did you?

Broken Dreams

By Gregg Beckett
Written July 30, 2015
Actaully did enjoy this film, but for some reason I could not get past Russell Crowes doo???? Although I love Catherine Zeta-Jones, I think she should have had more presence on screen. One scene that I found to be somewhat far fetched, was on the train to Montauk when Mark Walbergh and the campaign manager have their banter back and forth, I found it unbelievable since it was supposedly such a big deal when Walbergh had his high profile trial, that this guy would not have recognized him? Quite the cast of Great Actors, just seemed like movie was produced quickly to make a quick buck.
17 out of 23 found this helpful. Did you?

Something's Missing

By COVER4
Written August 29, 2015
Overall, it was ok. I went away with thinking that something was missing - either there were problems with the script or with the editing. The movie could have been great with better editing. In terms of the acting, Mark Wahlberg was good, Catherine Zeta-Jones was great although I would have liked her have a larger role - because she's so good. Russell Crowe's performance was lacking and the tan was both inexplicable and distracting. Alona Tal deserves recognition for a great performance as Katy Bradshaw opposite Mark Wahlberg's Billy Taggart. Jeffrey Wright, Kyle Chandler and Barry Pepper all seemed to be miscast in their roles. The ending did seem to set things up for a sequel of some sort. Maybe they can explain all of the missing details in the sequel - where I'd like to see the chemistry between Billy Taggart and Katy Bradshaw play out.
16 out of 30 found this helpful. Did you?