Entertaining And Unique.

By Alon Patterson
Written March 03, 2013
Not all books translate well into movies. From what I've read and heard, this is the case with this film. I think what those avid readers fail to grasp is that with a book the author has a vast, almost unlimited, canvas upon which to paint a story, but with screenplays, it's a 110-120 pages of action and dialog. If it's not on the page, it's not on the screen. Therein lies the a difference between books and films. Long, rambling setups in books reduced to dialog, visualization unique to a reader becomes one size fits all for a viewer. So don't go in comparing this movie to the book or likely, as with others, you'll be disappointed. Instead, experience it as a play and you'll have a much different perspective. This is a good film, not a great one. It's populated with decent performances, excellent effects, a good story and some fresh and promising young talent...well worth the price of a ticket. See it. You won't be disappointed.
15 out of 23 found this helpful. Did you?

Highly Disapointed

By skukahiko
Written February 15, 2013
I read the book before the premiere and was extremyl disapointed to find that i did not recognize the story line. You would think that the movie was a pre-qual almost. i mean one of the major notions of the book was that Lena and Ethan could communicate telepathically. In the classroom, Lena was supposed to be sharpening her pencil when the windows broke and nobody but her was really hurt. not to mention there were more incidents like the Winter formal. And what happend to the Sweet Sixteen Party concert. and Ethan knew about Link and Ridley. So really what the hell did i watch yesterday cause that was not Beautiful Creatures. as for the Critic comments. I agree the accents were terrible. No cratch that they were etrocious. But for the most part i like the acting/ I just wished that the director stuck to the realy story cause the book was fantastic and i look foward to reading Chaos, Darkness, and Redemption.
15 out of 19 found this helpful. Did you?

BOOK TO SCREEN,

By Jwat5
Written February 16, 2013
NO WAY , I LOVED THE BOOKS I REALLY REALLY DID, IN AND Un like TWILIGHT THEY DIDNT GIVE ALL THE TIme needed to develop the characters .or the story , From book to the screen They cute out all what makes the story good, just a cut up version of the books, the Least to say I'm VERY VERY DISAPPOINTED IN ALL THE HEADS OF THIS FILM , (I took 20 people to see it) , I LOOKED SO FORWARD TO IT AND I GO AND ITS GOT UNDER DEVELOP CHARACTERS, UNDER DEVELOPS SEENS AND UNDER a DEVELOPED STORy line ,. Im VERY DISAPPOINTED. Anne rice if you read her queen of the damnded, and saw the movie this movie FULLY REMINDED ME OF that , BUTCHERED IS WHAT WE CALL IT . IT WAS A massacre OF THE BOOK (GREAT BOOKS ) I could see why they had this problem , if they gave it the time it needed u might have had to do two movies as they didn't take the time to do this THEY SHOULD HAVE DONE IT . they cut up the book in to many peace. as a book Lover I wanted to see the book on screen and this was not IT. what it w
15 out of 22 found this helpful. Did you?

Disappointment for a valentine release!!!!!

By pennyc28
Written February 16, 2013
I enjoyed the book, the movie is HORRIBLE: poor representation of the best seller. to many changes. From start to finish the movie leaves out and changes to many details that makes it exciting, and lacking in special effects, I should have stayed home and read the second book!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
15 out of 25 found this helpful. Did you?

No No No No No!!

By kwilliams1786
Written December 01, 2013
If you have read any of the books, definetely do not even bother watching this movie. So disappointed I almosted walked out of the theater....
15 out of 23 found this helpful. Did you?