53

Mr. Showbiz

By Cody Clark
It's a lock to pile up the honors during Hollywood's annual awards season next spring (at the Golden Raspberries and the MTV Movie Awards).
Full Review
50

Chicago Tribune

By Michael Wilmington
Scientology or not, the movie is a battlefield bummer that makes you want to revolt.
Full Review
50

San Francisco Chronicle

By Bob Graham
Is it worth seeing once? Sure.
Full Review
38

Boston Globe

By Jay Carr
So heavy and lifeless that you keep waiting for those three little front-row kibitzers from "Mystery Science Theatre 3000" to appear at the bottom of the screen to start goofing on it.
Full Review
38

Baltimore Sun

By Chris Kaltenbach
An underlit, overlong, underwritten and overloud albatross of a movie.
Full Review
38

USA Today

By Andy Seiler
The script, based on a novel by Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard, is deeply dumb, depressingly derivative (ripping off "Planet of the Apes" the most) and just plain nonsense.
Full Review
25

New York Post

By Lou Lumenick
Goes from being tediously terrible to downright gigglesome.
Full Review
25

Entertainment Weekly

By Owen Gleiberman
Just a lumbering, poorly photographed piece of derivative sci-fi drivel, full of grunting extras scampering around in animal pelts and more dank, trash-strewn sets than I ever care to see again.
Full Review
0

New York Daily News

By Jack Mathews
One of the darkest, ugliest, most uninvolving and incomprehensible major-studio fantasies I've ever seen.
Full Review
0

Rolling Stone

By Peter Travers
With this kind of epic ineptitude -- hell, the flick is set in the year 3000 -- you go for "worst of the millennium."
Full Review
9 out of 100
Overwhelming dislike
Metascore® based on all critic reviews. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more favorable reviews.