Anna Karenina is awful

By Kallrhonda
Written December 26, 2014
Loved Jude and Kiera but my husband and I left 20 minutes into the movie. I suppose the director thought it was "artsy" to show the movie as if it were a play, with sets changing, etc. However, it just left us scratching our heads wondering what was going on! We expected a moving, serious movie, but instead felt like we were watching a bad vaudville act. This was terrible! Half theater and half film and not the best of either. Come on guys! The previews did not even prepare you for this disaster. Sorry.
17 out of 29 found this helpful. Did you?

Stylized and Artificial

By Caramel6
Written February 28, 2015
We went with high expectations but left disappointed. A lot of effort went into making this movie but the result felt artificial and lifeless. Beautiful settings, beautiful costumes and a beautiful Anna Karenina. Great original novel. Too much art and not enough life in the movie translation of the book. We were surprised that the movie is not showing widely. After seeing the movie the reason became clear.
16 out of 28 found this helpful. Did you?

Visually Stunning

By FLASH1465
Written January 28, 2015
I rate this film an A. I have never read the novel so I went in blind. It is a visually stunning film!! The set design and costuming were top notch. The fact that it is part play and part film is a new concept to me and worked well. Keira is beautiful and perhaps the best period piece actress I've ever seen (Atonement and Pride & Prejudice). Her performance is fantastic, believable, moving, and deserving of any nominations that come her way. GO see it.
15 out of 20 found this helpful. Did you?

Terrifically Romantic!

By pedsarq
Written March 02, 2015
Anna Karenina remains one of the great tragic stories of all time. This new retelling mixes elements of the stage with classic Hollywood moviemaking. Let me explain. There are many scenes that either start or end on a theater stage, as if to create a limited window into the action or drama that's unfolding. There are even scenes that are highly choreographed where all of the characters are doing routine movements in unison. It works well, for the most part, and elevates the artistry of the scenes. There were moments when I was tired of the gimmick and didn't care for it, but it was well established and added a certain flair that I appreciated overall. Aside from this, it's essentially faithful to the Tolstoy novel and that's not a bad thing at all. Keira Knightley is terrific!
12 out of 19 found this helpful. Did you?

Why call it Anna Karenina. Why not call it "I am so clever as a writer/director?"

By Elainee
Written October 29, 2014
It open showing a theater and the people/characters in it. Curtains, wheels, walkways...behind the scenes. Ah..a train! That's foreshadowing, just in case you didn't know. There are no real people, no character development. Just magnificently dresse beautiful people wandering about when they are not dancing. It is a pagnent. But so over the top it becomes silly. The jewlery should win an Oscar. Not the actors.
12 out of 21 found this helpful. Did you?