A DISAPPOINTING REMAKE OF LEO TOLSTOY'S EXCEPTIONAL NOVEL.

By Peneflix
Written November 29, 2012
Leo Tolstoy (1828-1910) is an iconic, archival author; his books, required reading in higher education; "War and Peace"(1860's) a massive epic, still resides comfortably in the annuals of finest historical novels ever composed; his genius unquestioned, forever lionized... "Anna Karenina" (1875) written at a time when women where chattel; had no power or control over their destinies or the unexpected whims of their hearts; shackled in man-made conventions, rules, restrictions (as crippling as their corsets). "Anna" is woman felled by love and life: married at eighteen, unfamiliar with disruptive, all-consuming passion, marches precipitously towards her sealed fate. She is tragic, but in the twenty-first century, rather stale... TWO STARS!! ***For full review please visit peneflix(dot)com!!!
8 out of 15 found this helpful. Did you?

When bad casting of a leading role ruins a work of art

By Russkaya
Written November 17, 2012
It's a crying shame when what is basically a lovely movie, with some of the most gorgeous cinematography and art direction is years, is soured by a horribly-miscast leading role. I refer to Aaron Taylor-Johnson's effeminate and creepy Count Vronsky...looking like the blonde twin of the Colorado Mass Shooter. How on earth can we believe that this creep was the cause of Anna's downfall? The movie started beautifully with the opera-house concept then quickly took a nosedive the moment that Vronsky appears. Additionally, I did not care for some of the odd choreography and wavy hand movements by ballroom dancers in the background -- were they trying to dance the hula? Most distracting. But the worst thing was Taylor-Johnson as Count Vronsky. His looks and manner just 'kill' the story.
8 out of 15 found this helpful. Did you?

Very pretty, but....

By raskin46
Written November 18, 2012
This isn't Pride and Prejudice....it's more a Chanel commercial for Tolstoy. The movie is very stylized to the detriment of characterization....Count Vronksy is a 19th Century club kid until he suddenly becomes emotionally adult (but nothing leads you to that conclusion) and the same goes with Anna, the dutiful wife who shuns Vronsky and then is suddenly in bed with him and on and on. I really liked Matthew Macfadyen (who teams up with Knightley again), as Anna's brother...I've never seen him so alive and animated (he usually seems dull and plodding). I'd say go see it if you like Tolstoy....but despite the beauty, I was struggling to literally stay awake at 10am on a Saturday morning.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Did you?

It was OK

By erika514
Written November 27, 2012
It is a beautiful movie,visually, but I did not care for the parts that were in a theater, like we are kind of watching a play. If I want to see a play I will go to the theater. It just wasn't consistent, maybe if they kept it going throughout, or just leaving that part out. It is based on a work of literature, so I really can't complain about the ending, but nothing is tied together at the end. Again it was beautiful to watch, and I enjoyed it to a point, but don't fully recommend it.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Did you?

GOOD movie, BAD projection

By cinesurfer22
Written August 26, 2014
This fine visual spectacle was RUINED by a mis-aligned projection lens on one projector at the Consolidated KAHALA 8 theaters, which is the only theater showing this movie. The whole left side of the screen was defocused every other reel. If you're looking to see this movie DON'T see it at this theater and if you do, complain to the manager and ask for your money back. Its really too bad, I enjoyed this movie except for the poor projection.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Did you?