Anna Karenina (2012)Movie Reviews


  • Go Based on 8,391 reviews
    Breakdown:
  • Go
    Written November 17, 2012

    Beautifully engaging

    by MedRed

    Anna Karenina takes place in some of the most lavish and detailed settings to grace the big screen. This movie is a feast for the eyes. The scene transitions happen as if on a stage in a theater.

    The actual story is close to 70% of the novel's content. It does deviate in some places mostly through omission of details as opposed to rewriting the story. The acting is top shelf and the story is well paced.

    For Tolstoy purists, you may be left wanting more. For someone that wants to see an engaging tragedy based on one of the greatest novels ever written, you won't be disappointed.

    • 39 out of 52 found this review helpful.
    • Was this helpful to you? 
    • Yes
    • No
  • Must Go!
    Written November 20, 2012

    Beautiful vision

    Anna Karenina is enchanting. Part film, part play...fantastic. The performances were stirring. Keira Knightly plays Anna in such a moving yet subtle peformance. Aaron Johnson was amazing. His eyes are absolutely mesmerizing. Such chemistry between Aaron and Keira. When Count Vronsky first appears on screen he took my breath away, literally.

    • 33 out of 43 found this review helpful.
    • Was this helpful to you? 
    • Yes
    • No
  • Must Go!
    Written November 25, 2012

    Breathtaking

    How it is played out is a little different than traditional films...beautifully filmed. You will connect with the characters , enjoy the music, dances, costumes, the story. Keira Knightly plays the part beautifully.
    If you like period films and are a romantic at heart....it is a must see.

    • 23 out of 33 found this review helpful.
    • Was this helpful to you? 
    • Yes
    • No
  • No
    Written November 24, 2012

    Miscast, and oh sooo boring!!!

    One of the most passionate love stories of all times has been reduced to a few badly placed sound bites. Judd Law does his best, but there is only so much that this great actor can do with so very little to work with! Rent the original!!

    • 19 out of 25 found this review helpful.
    • Was this helpful to you? 
    • Yes
    • No
  • So-so
    Written November 18, 2012

    Enjoyable and fun but far from the novel

    by oksanah

    It is of course impossible to transform the whole book on to the screen of a movie theater but I thought a better job could have been accomplished. A lot of important parts have been ommited and unimportant were displayed. In L. Tolstoy's life religion played a very important role and in his book one is able to follow authors questions and thoughts about the purpose and meaning of life which were bearly touched upon in the movie. Will this movie satisfy and entertain the American audience? yes, but does it convey the ideas that the author was trying to accomplish in his novel? no. On the other hand, well picked actors that have done a marvelous job, a good music selection and background scenes.

    • 27 out of 42 found this review helpful.
    • Was this helpful to you? 
    • Yes
    • No
  • Must Go!
    Written December 3, 2012

    Spectacular

    LOVED everything about this film, I am hoping it wins many awards next year. Kiera is beautiful and I am sure I will view this film again. Costumes, sets, casting, all right on the money and kudo's to all involved. An amazing experience that will thrill anyone who love period pieces and great literature.

    • 20 out of 28 found this review helpful.
    • Was this helpful to you? 
    • Yes
    • No
  • Go
    Written December 8, 2012

    REALLY A MUSICAL!

    I read the book and thought I knew what I was about to see but was completely surprised by the unusual and very creative setting of this movie. I hear that the critics are just as shocked and many didn't like it but I did - enough to see it twice. The movie was actually choreographed throughout so that the music and dance-like movements were an important part of telling the beautiful story. I especially loved that the whole Tolstoy novel was portrayed - not just "Anna's" story. Anna's brother & sister-in-law as well as another couple's love stories were told also and were a nice contrast to Anna's tragedy. Also, the movie included Tolstoy's comments on the rigidity of Russian society and brought out the class warfare that would lead to the communist revolution years later. It was great - I would see it again!

    • 19 out of 27 found this review helpful.
    • Was this helpful to you? 
    • Yes
    • No
  • Go
    Written December 1, 2012

    Anna Karenina

    The beginning was a little choppy, but once I figured out what the director was going for, it got better.

    I was so mad at Keira Knightley, she was playing games with both men. The things she said to her husband enraged me, which means it was well done. Jude Law had such a range, I wouldn't have know it was him, if I had read up on it. He really made me care about him.

    Good Movie!

    • 13 out of 19 found this review helpful.
    • Was this helpful to you? 
    • Yes
    • No
  • Go
    Written December 16, 2012

    Powerful story presented in an unique way

    by

    Did not read Tolstoy's book but the movie presented a powerful emotional story. But it was presented in a unique way which I found somewhat distracting and seemed to lessen the impact for me. But it is definitely worth seeing.

    • 7 out of 7 found this review helpful.
    • Was this helpful to you? 
    • Yes
    • No
  • No
    Written December 15, 2012

    Weird

    by oneof5

    I like Keira Knightly and I love Anna Karenina (the book). I was very disappointed in this movie! It was weird at best. Low budget screamed from this movie. These people are Russian aristocracy and the director makes the characters, actors, and the setting is a stage!! It DOES look like a bad dream!!! I wanted to see over the top residencies and beautiful Russian countryside not a danged back stage. CHEAP!!! Weird!!! Tolstoy is turning over in his grave!!! They might as well made the setting, Disney World. In fact Disney World probably would have been better.

    • 18 out of 30 found this review helpful.
    • Was this helpful to you? 
    • Yes
    • No
  • Oh No!
    Written December 6, 2012

    Anna Karenina is awful

    Loved Jude and Kiera but my husband and I left 20 minutes into the movie. I suppose the director thought it was "artsy" to show the movie as if it were a play, with sets changing, etc. However, it just left us scratching our heads wondering what was going on! We expected a moving, serious movie, but instead felt like we were watching a bad vaudville act. This was terrible! Half theater and half film and not the best of either. Come on guys! The previews did not even prepare you for this disaster. Sorry.

    • 6 out of 6 found this review helpful.
    • Was this helpful to you? 
    • Yes
    • No
  • So-so
    Written November 26, 2012

    Hybrid style fails!

    The play/film fusion was choppy and never grabs you...no willing suspension of disbelief. However the visuals were rich and scene transitions were creative. I usually love period pieces, but this one did not make it.

    • 9 out of 13 found this review helpful.
    • Was this helpful to you? 
    • Yes
    • No
  • Must Go!
    Written December 2, 2012

    A Stunningly Smart Film

    This movie was exceptional. It was a play within a movie. The sets were creative and alluring. The acting was top shelf. The costumes and jewelry were unbeliievable. I loved this film from start to finish. If you read the book you will love the movie!

    • 5 out of 5 found this review helpful.
    • Was this helpful to you? 
    • Yes
    • No
  • Go
    Written December 28, 2012

    Visually Stunning

    I rate this film an A. I have never read the novel so I went in blind. It is a visually stunning film!! The set design and costuming were top notch. The fact that it is part play and part film is a new concept to me and worked well. Keira is beautiful and perhaps the best period piece actress I've ever seen (Atonement and Pride & Prejudice). Her performance is fantastic, believable, moving, and deserving of any nominations that come her way. GO see it.

    • 5 out of 5 found this review helpful.
    • Was this helpful to you? 
    • Yes
    • No
  • Oh No!
    Written December 9, 2012

    Why call it Anna Karenina. Why not call it "I am so clever as a writer/director?"

    by Elainee

    It open showing a theater and the people/characters in it. Curtains, wheels, walkways...behind the scenes. Ah..a train! That's foreshadowing, just in case you didn't know. There are no real people, no character development. Just magnificently dresse beautiful people wandering about when they are not dancing. It is a pagnent. But so over the top it becomes silly. The jewlery should win an Oscar. Not the actors.

    • 5 out of 5 found this review helpful.
    • Was this helpful to you? 
    • Yes
    • No

Anna Karenina (2012) Movie Reviews + Ratings

Fans say

Go
8,391 fan reviews

Critics say

Go See all critic reviews

Tweets About Anna Karenina (2012)

83% positive
Join the conversation

LoveLustLine Someone retweeted my Anna Karenina post. I was watching the movie with Keira Knightley as Anna not the tv show from Ch.7!!!!!!

6 days ago.

Catalysis_Comms #FactOfTheDay Anna Karenina is over 800 pages long, but it was originally published in serialized form. #BookClub

6 days ago.

SaraPMeneses There was something terrible and cruel about her charm #annakarenina #latenightreading

7 days ago.

kirby_mcc Why do they have British accents in "Anna Karenina?" I thought it was set in Russia

7 days ago.

mariachuchus it's a bit late but anna karenina was so good omg

7 days ago.

Anna Karenina (2012) Featured Trailers + Video Clips

Exclusive Features

Cast Interviews Exclusive Cast Interview Keira Knightley talks about her "tricky" character, Jude Law on his passive-aggressive role and Joe Wright on filming the movie on a stage. More Films on Fandango's Award Watch A sneak peek at Hollywood's race to the Oscars!